Homework for you

Fight Club End Scene Analysis Essays

Category: Essay


Explanation of the events at the end of Fight Club? Movies - TV Stack Exchange

At the end of Fight Club, the narrator disables a bomb that Tyler had set up in a van in the basement, and then he and Tyler get into a fight. The fight ends with the narrator being thrown down some stairs and Tyler stalking off somewhere. When they next appear, they are in a room near the top of a skyscraper.

How did Tyler get the narrator to this room? Was it in the same building, and if so, was Tyler then expecting the narrator to disable the bomb? If it wasn't in the same building, how did Tyler have time to get the narrator there, since he says earlier that all the bombs are set to go off in fifteen minutes (at the beginning of the bomb disabling scene), the next scene opens with him saying "three minutes", and the fight/bomb disabling scene lasts about five minutes.

asked Jan 11 '12 at 17:42

I'm going to assume you did not get the twist of the movie and will do my best to explain what happens:

The whole twist of the movie (and an excellent reason to watch it multiple times) is that The Narrator (nameless, some assume his name is Jack) actually has a split personality disorder. Tyler Durden does not exist and is just a figment of his split personality. It is explained when The Narrator sleeps, Tyler is awake. Any scene that involves either Tyler or The Narrator doing something, it is the same person doing it as he is both Tyler and The Narrator. What people actually see is The Narrator, whether it be Tyler's personality or not. Any scene involving the both of them is revealed to be The Narrator talking to himself or imagining themselves talking to one another.

With that bit of background out of the way, lets assume the fight with the van towards the end is just another one of their internal struggles. The two personalities fight over control of The Narrator's body and it seems that Tyler has won by throwing The Narrator down the steps, incapacitating The Narrator's personality, leaving Tyler in charge of the body. Therefore, when The Narrator regains 'consciousness' (so to speak), he realizes Tyler took them to the top of the skyscraper.

Hope that cleared it up.

In regards to the time, well, it is a very rare occurrence that 5 minutes is actually 5 real minutes. But the point that I haven't covered, that I realized, is the location that they're in. They are in a building, facing the one that was going to be blown up, for a better view. It is assumed that when The Narrator personality is 'knocked out', Tyler reset the charges and escaped to the top floor of the other building.

@ChristianRau Also, I do not remember it being implied that they blow up at the end. Is this something in the book (that I need to read)? From what I could gather the implied ending is they watch the destruction of the financial buildings together, "ushering in" their "new world" of Project Mayhem. – TylerShads Apr 22 '12 at 4:44

I don't see how this doesn't make sense.

They may or may not be in a different place (there was a short blackout). As it is already mentioned that Tyler knows of "Jack" and that he has control of every one around them/him it's hardly difficult to believe that he could engineer the movement of his self (if he even needed to, due to "Jack" not remembering 90% of his life). He could have been carried or he could have taken control of "Jacks" body and walked him upstairs as it's already pointed out that he has no memory when Tyler takes over. It could have been as simple as. fight, black out. be Tyler, walk to another place and sit in a chair, be "Jack".

answered Jan 12 '14 at 5:50

It shows that the narrator defuses the bomb when he pulls out the green wire.

That's why Tyler gets mad and why they start to fight.

answered Feb 12 '14 at 0:52

2017 Stack Exchange, Inc

Other articles

Fight Club Character Analysis Essay - 1663 Words

Fight Club Character Analysis

For the following analysis, I will be discussing the movie Fight Club's two main characters. They are "Jack" played by Edward Norton, and Tyler Durden played by Brad Pitt. However the twist to the movie turns out that Jack and Tyler are the same person and Tyler is Jack's real name. Tyler the character is everything that Jack the character is not. The story narration is provided by the protagonist of "Fight Club," "Jack." The ambivalent protagonist, who only refers to himself as "Jack." An ambivalent protagonist, usually the main character, is someone the audience likes, but who possesses character flaws.

The character "Jack" is a character the audience will feel sympathy for and even come to like. However, it is obvious he has serious problems. "Jack's" main problem, what the audience comes to find out, is his alter ego, Tyler Durden. "Jack" struggles to take control as he sees that Tyler's acts of vandalism are wrong. However, he cannot stop himself until the very end. However, even before the character of Tyler Durden is introduced it is clear that "Jack" has personal problems; insomnia, discontent for his job, and a dependency on support groups. "Jack" is also faced with a moral dilemma as well as constantly being put into danger, another characteristic of the ambivalent protagonist. "Jack" has the personality of an obedient, yet not very outgoing man. He goes to work, comes home, and wants to simplify his life. He sets up his life as simply as possible. For example, he wears the same white shirt, black pants, and black tie everyday. Jack is a very subservient type of person. For example, he goes to meetings his boss doesn't want to attend. He hates his job and he hates his life, however he thinks he is ok with the job and his life but is tired of doing the same thing everyday. It is important to see that "Jack" picks out items that would best represent the type of person he is such as the furniture in his house.

He is a gen-xer that has grown to the.

Please sign up to read full document.


Kory Weener Film Review 2 FightClub is a psychoanalytical film that addresses the themes of identification, freedom and violence. It acknowledges Freud’s principle which stresses that human behavior is the result of psychological conflicting forces and in order to analyze these forces, there needs to be a way of tapping into peoples minds. The narrator tells his personal journey of self-discovery through his alter ego and his schizophrenic experiences. The movie is told through a sequence of events is told through a flashback that starts with insomnia. Jack starts attending support groups for testicular cancer survivors that let him release his emotions and can finally is able to sleep at night. Although he pretends to be someone he isn’t, he becomes addicted to these support groups because he has met people who will listen to him and feel sorry for his problems. His apartment explodes and he moves in with a man, who he had just met on a plane ride, who teaches him lessons about freedom and empowerment. When Jack is upset about losing all his belongings, Tyler warns him that his possessions will own him. They find a new therapy in beating each other up which they call FightClub . Others join the elite fighting club and Jack is completely consumed with his new lifestyle and becomes uninvolved with his life at work. The story twists and Jack’s life becomes unstable.

1493 Words | 4 Pages

“You met me at a strange time in my life.” These are the closing words to David Fincher’s ​ FightClub .​ Released in 1999 by Fox Studios, it stars Edward Norton, Brad Pitt, and Helena Bonham Carter. The film is a contemporary art piece that speaks the language of the modern emasculated­macho man. It contains considerable amounts of violence that some would call gratuitous or senseless, but is in fact an attempt to speak metaphorically towards a deeper meaning. ​ FightClub ​. like all art, is a reflection of our culture. It attempts to speak to us about the state of our society by telling the tale of an individual’s development from “boyhood” to “manhood.” The story is a wild ride through the psychological turmoil that is necessary for the development of masculinity in modern culture. Although a generalized interpretation of the film could yield a perception of sexism, machismo, and ignorant violence, a more patient ​ examination leads to a deeper realization of the film’s powerful meaning. This paper will discuss how ​ FightClub ​. when properly examined, is less of a meditation on violence and sexism than it is an exploration of the journey a man goes through to discover his true identity. Using metaphorical themes, unorthodox storytelling, and creative mise­en­scene, ​ FightClub ​.

2533 Words | 8 Pages

<center><b>Reading in-between the lines: An analysis of FightClub </b></center> <br> <br>a novel by Chuck Palahniuk <br>a film directed by David Fincher <br> <br>"You are not your job. You are not how much you have in the bank. You are not the contents of your wallet. You are not your khakis. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake. What happens first is you can't sleep. What happens then is there's a gun in your mouth. And what happens next is you meet Tyler Durden. Let me tell you about Tyler. He had a plan. In Tyler we trusted. Tyler says the things you own, end up owning you. It's only after you've lost everything that you're free to do anything. FightClub represents that kind of freedom. First rule of FightClub . You do not talk about FightClub . Second rule of FightClub . You do not talk about FightClub . Tyler says self-improvement is masturbation. Tyler says self-destruction might be the answer." <br> <br>The novel FightClub . by Jack Palahniuk was published in 1996 and released as a motion picture starring Brad Pitt and Edward Norton in October of 1999. Both the novel and motion picture proved to be very successful in their release to the public for one simple reason: FightClub is a reflection of the suffering experienced.

6995 Words | 17 Pages

FightClub By Chuck Palahniuk In this assignment I will be analyzing some of the most interesting elements in the book “FightClub ” explained with Maffesolis Retraditionalization-theory. I will draw lines to our main topic Consumerism. The book is written by Chuck Palahniuk and was first published in Great Britain in 1997. As the book includes a few different topics, I will be focusing on the development of fightclub and project Mayhem. After the presentation of Anthony Giddens’ thoughts, which was based on the detraditionalization of late modern society, came Michel Maffesoli’s appearance with a new theory that turned the discussion of late modern society’s processions upside down. As the sociologist Anthony Giddens saw tendencies of detraditionalization saw Michel Maffesoli a trend of retraditionalization as a reaction of late modern society. Maffesoli declares the following: “The conformism of youth, the passion for likeness within groups or ‘tribes’, the phenomena of fashion, standardized culture, up to and including unisexualization of appearance, permits us to claim that what we are witnessing is the loss of the idea of the individual in favour of a much less distinct mass.”1 Said with other words, we live in a society where the individualizationprocess has come to an end. Instead individuals seek for answers, stability, meaning and identity through these groups and communities.

1080 Words | 4 Pages

FightClubanalysis The film medium has the unique ability to express the entire spectrum of human emotions in the short space of an hour. They can make us weep like we were babies, provoke anger with massive intensity, or render us so utterly devoured that staring into a television screen becomes a life-long obsession. This expression of art is truly powerful, not only in creating emotions in the confinement of one's own mind, but also in the larger, collective mind of a society. Films have the power to put forth ideas that are adopted by the general public and by doing so they can initiate change in the world. Throughout history certain cinematic masterpieces have even been so powerful that they have changed the public's notion of important social issues, or even caused major political change. By changing your opinions, making you question authorities, creating new perspectives and triggering your every emotion, great films can be your biggest source of inspiration. They can give you identity. With films having this immense and important power, the question is inevitably. What makes a film great? In David Fincher's “FightClub ” we are introduced to the main character . a white-collar office employee (portrayed by Edward Norton) who is just another face in the crowd. He is nobody, and his dull and lifeless days are used on the most meaningless of activities you can imagine. The main.

1173 Words | 3 Pages

Tyler Thompson ENC 1101 Prof. Kennedy 13 March 2012 FightClub . The Narrator vs. Tyler Durden The movie FightClub is a very violent, satirical movie that centers around the main idea that modern culture makes men into cowards. That modern capitalist society turns men into mindless drones who have no individualism and no testosterone. The two main characters of the film, The Narrator (Edward Norton) and Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt), illustrate the absolute polar ends of this main theme. The Narrator represents society as it is. He is increasingly bored, self-help addicted, disillusioned and dissatisfied with his emasculated life (Filmsite). Tyler Durden, who is the exact opposite as The Narrator, is best described as a charismatic, anarchic punk and soap salesman (Filmsite). Throughout the course of the movie, the contrasts and developments of these two characters emphasizes the overall theme of the movie that our possessions and lives own us and, in the words of Tyler; “It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything” (IMDb). The Narrator is essentially a representation of everything wrong in modern society. At the beginning of the movie, he is depressed, absolutely bored with his life, and he absolutely loathes his job. His only sanctuary from all of this is to attend “self-help” seminars “where he can hug those less fortunate than himself and find catharsis in.

887 Words | 3 Pages

FightClub At the risk of breaking the first two rules of Fightclub . in this scene analysis I will be discussing a scene from FightClub (David Fincher 1999). Using mise en scene I will be analyzing the particular scene at about minute 93 when Tyler (Brad Pitt), Jack (Edward Norton) and two others from the fightclub . get into a car together. Jack climbs into the passenger's seat and Tyler drives. Tyler and Jack begin and have an argument that reaffirms a main theme: letting go of control. Throughout this entire movie, Jack watches the world move around him. He feels he is unable to control anything around him, though he constantly tries. The drive and ensuing crash in this scene parallels this theme. Mise en scene includes four main parts which then have sub parts. The four main parts are setting, the human figure, lighting, and composition. However, I will only be using the first three. First is the setting. This scene takes place in a car driving on a highway at night and in the rain. Setting in most cases is used to set the tone or mood of a scene and for this one it sets a dreary tone. The car is almost full and although they do have room to move they are trapped inside a small area. This is showing how Jack is stuck in his small way of thinking. With Tyler driving, Jack no longer has control and at the end of the scene, through a.

1097 Words | 3 Pages

The 1999 film, FightClub . is controversial in the sense that it can be interpreted at a superfluity of angles. However, the effectiveness of the final scene to reflect the narrator’s catharsis is indisputable as it is accompanied by the song “Where is My Mind” by The Pixies. The song itself is vital to the ending scene and ultimately the entire film. The lyrics are significant to the narrator’s inner turmoil, not only throughout the film, but also at the concluding moment and the auditory elements parallel the events and emotions of the concluding scene. FightClub centers around an unnamed narrator who projects his unconscious identity as a separate character . Tyler Durdin. Tyler frees the narrator from his former pretenses of life regarding society through self destruction. The narrator burns his house, quits his job, and beings to live recklessly, seemingly by coincidence. He subconsciously rids himself of all worldly possessions. Together, Tyler and the narrator form FightClub - an underground group that thrives on destruction of themselves and government establishments. As the narrator gets weaker and less powerful, Tyler gets stronger and better looking, symbolizing his strengthening id. Towards the end of the film, the narrator comes to the realization that he is Tyler. The ending scene puts the narrator and Marla, a woman with whom he has an on again-off again.

436 Words | 2 Pages

Critical analysis Fight Club movie - University Creative Arts and Design - Marked by

Critical analysis Fight Club movie

Extracts from this document.

Fight Club In this essay I will be explaining how the mise-en-scene functions to generate meaning in 'Fight Club with the aid of the first 10 shots using analytical evidence from a shot breakdown. film that explores the idea of an underground revolution which results in a large number of the world participating in a comedic yet dark way. The storyline follows Edward Norton's character who creates an imaginary friend in the image of how he would like to be and goes on to create an underground fight club, which eventually turns into an underground terrorist group who see themselves as revolutionaries doing the world a favour by destroying the world credit agencies and banks. The first ten shots which I have analysed are the introduction shots which start the film at the end of the story. This means the viewer see's and hears part of the ending but does not know how the situation got to where it is, and where it is going therefore enticing to continue watching. The mise-en-scene in these shots is there to convey the feel for the film, being dark with the lighter mood in parts, which it does well through use of all aspects of what's on the screen. . read more.

This shot can also been seen as an establishing shot giving a better idea of where the two characters are as it is the first time the location is revealed from a further distance showing more of the surroundings. The room they are both in is obviously quite high up in the building which can be seen by the buildings outside, it's also an empty room with nothing but the chair that Norton is sitting in and a few lights. This emptiness can connote a number of things but from what is seen so far in the scene, it would seem that it is to emphasise the two characters relationship with each other, possibly bringing them together as they are the only two characters that have been shown so far. Despite Norton's character being the main protagonist, he is lacking control of what is happening in the scene which can be seen through performance. Pitt's Character is the one holding the gun and standing up which is significant because it shows him as higher than Norton who is sitting down starring at Pitt over his shoulder as if to find out what is happening, almost as if he does not know what to do with himself and looking to Pitt for help. . read more.

Throughout the film, the only two filters used are the blue/ grey filter and the yellow/ orange filter; this is useful for viewers watching to help sustain a meaning throughout the film, not confusing them. 'Elements of style work more 'unconsciously', meaning is hidden and the interpretation deciphers and translates.' (Gibbs & Pye, 2005; 216) It is up to the viewer to figure out the meanings behind what is happening on the screen, it is also up to them whether or not they want to. 'Fight Club' has a lot of meanings behind each aspect of what is shown on the screen to help enhance the film as a whole. The interpretations that can be taken away simply need to be viewed with an analytical eye to see how very dark the film can be at the same time attempting to address the issues raised with a lighter feel. I believe that the 10 shots that were analysed in the shot breakdown together are there to introduce the film by showing viewers part of the end of the story so that they will need to find out how it begins and ends using simple mise-en-scene alongside computer animation to impress. . read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Fine Art, Design Studies, Art History, Crafts section.

Found what you're looking for? Related University Degree Fine Art, Design Studies, Art History, Crafts essays

Although La Haine is not simply a film with a social message, exposing the brutalized lives of minorities and the demands for the end of their exclusion, the movie is also a representation of life in the banlieue (suburban), in a French society in crisis towards social disintegration.

  • This piece of fiction was critical to the films success, as everyone already knows the main storyline and ending before the film actually begins. To rely on this as the basis of the screenplay could have led to the film sinking like the Titanic itself.

    1. They are all done in Spanish and most of them are shot in Mexico or Spain. Del Toro explains that he started working on El Laberinto Del Fauno on a conceptual level in 1992. The end product I believe is a really well crafted fairy tale done in a very modernist manner.

    2. you could give me money, Torvald. Only as much as you can afford; then later I'll buy something with it." This just shows how important money is to both of them, but in completely opposite ways. The extreme difference between the roles of Nora and Torvald show many themes for those characters that continue throughout the play.

    1. (Flags of Our Fathers, 2006) and (Letters from Iwo Jima, 2006) has no black extras or actors, despite some evidence that black soldiers were there. Unfortunately, due to the fact that camps were still largely segregated back then, it would be largely inaccurate to place some of these soldiers in the larger scenes.

    2. Both his arms are angular in shape, making a triangular shape. This also implies a strength and solidness to his appearance. The colours used are warm colours of reds, yellows and oranges. An intense red is used to highlight Hitler from behind his head.

    1. Anyone who comes to visit of nearly any job or hobby would find something that would interest them, as there was so much to see and such a vast range of different and intriguing objects. Another thing about the museum that gave it such a special feel was the building itself.

    2. is that there are no actresses[6], male impersonators play all female parts. By emphasizing and stylizing feminine movements and gestures, they are able to create a larger-than-life femininity. Onnagata speak in falsetto and they stand with the knees and back slightly bent so as to look smaller.

      Looking for expert help with your Creative Arts and Design work?