Homework for you

Walkerton Tragedy Essay Topics

Category: Essay

Description

Canada and Safe Water Essay - Papers

Canada and Safe Water Essay

Canada and Safe Water

Canada is an enormous country that has its cities and communities spread form one
sea to another. Many great distances often separate these areas, and sometimes force these
areas to develop their own identities out of isolation. Even sometimes communities are faced
with disasters that force certain identities on them. Such identities can often resemble the
national identity, but most of the time, they represent the community’s own views. The way
a community sees national issues says a great deal about their identity and the same goes for
the national side. The way community issues are dealt with through the community shows a
great sense of pride and determination to make the best out of one’s surroundings, and the
way those same community issues are dealt with nationally shows how much our country
cares for the well being of the people. All of these issues present today are mostly portrayed
through the eyes of the media and their coverages. Today, the media presents its opinions on
the issues and determines the importance through the amount of coverage. A good example
to portray this situation is through Walkerton, Ontario. Last year, it was home of the
outbreak of E.Coli water contamination, a more community issue that got the attention of
the whole province and the nation. Since this disaster, there has been attempts from the
surrounding communities and the nation to improve the water systems, especially in Ontario.
This major event was covered by both “The Globe and Mail” and “The Toronto Star”, and
represented two opinions on how to deal with the matter.

Walkerton Disaster
On Friday, 26 May 2000 a quiet little town in the rural heartland of Ontario was
struck with.


. middle of paper.


. that the whole country felt a concern for the Walkerton tragedy.
Canada can definitely say that it learned from the situation, and it shows by the national
coverage. It was like everyone was trying to help, no matter where they lived. Canada is
considered a national community, that spreads from sea to sea.


Bibliography:
Canadian Press. “$2,000-a-head Walkerton Offer.” Toronto Star 30 January 2001.

Gorrie, Peter. “Can High Profit Flow with Safe Water?” Toronto Star 28 January 2001.

“Ontario’s Rural Heartland in Shock.” CBC Indepth. 2000.


Mallan, Caroline. “Half of Ontario Water Plants Flawed.” Toronto Star 22 December
2000.

Mittelstaedt, Martin. “Factory-farm Controls Aim to Protect Water.” Globe and Mail 24
January 2001.

Walkom, Thomas. “Is Water Seeping into Corporate Hands?” Toronto Star 29 January
2001.

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Essay on Has Work Become More Insecure and Unequal in Canada? - Inequality, regarding the workplace and workforce, refers to a state of being which involves an absence of opportunity, fairness, and equality, coupled with the presence of extreme variability for a person or group. This extreme variability in work related conditions can lead to the development of strong feelings of insecurity in any person who has experienced such inequality. Insecurity is a feeling or situation people may experience where there is uncertainty, instability, a lack of safe working conditions, and feelings of doubt about work etc. [tags: Canada]
. 7 Works Cited

1631 words
(4.7 pages)

Water Security: The Role of Government and Legistlature Essay - Human health Problems Water security encompasses providing proper water for everyone and if not done properly can cause many health issues. Many communities still have to boil their water before they can drink it (Saskatchewan eco network n.p.). Boil advisories mean that there are unacceptable levels of disease causing bacteria, viruses or parasites In the water system either in the source or from the system itself (Hc-sc.gc.ca 2014). Health of Canada is significantly affected by accessibility to clean and safe water (Flowcanada.org 2014). [tags: Canada, strategies, policies]
. 20 Works Cited

1252 words
(3.6 pages)

Essay on Water Scarcity: Privatization is Not the Solution - Although water is all around, very little is drinkable. Six billion people live on earth and 1.1 billion in 31 countries are unable to access safe, clean drinking water. California has only 20 years of water supply left. Ironically, even the wettest place on earth, Cherrapunji, India, has often water shortages. After years of millions of people dying of thirst and disease, a corporate movement to find a solution to the water crisis has now swept the world. Water, a fleeting resource vital to every life, every single day of the year, is now being taken out of the governments control and becoming a commodity bought and sold by big business, a.k.a privatization. [tags: Global Water Crisis]
. 7 Works Cited

1213 words
(3.5 pages)

Nature Canada Essay - NWA, MBSs and Marine Wildlife Areas under the important birds Areas program (IBA) which protect the most critical for the world’s birds. In Canada, Canadian Nature Federation and Bird Studies Canada have worked on IBA program. History of NWA-MBS Network: The Migratory Birds Convention Act (MBCA), passed by the federal Parliament in 1916 authorized the federal government to designate MBSs with a goal of protecting migratory birds against physical disturbance and hunting –the main threats to bird populations at the time. [tags: Wildlife Areas, Biodiversity, Canada]

961 words
(2.7 pages)

Canada Should Sell Water to America Essay - Since more than 70% of the Earth is covered with water, one would assume that there is enough water for everyone. However, this statement would be incorrect. Only 3% of that water is considered usable and 2% of the usable water is locked in the polar ice caps. This leaves 1% of that water for the use of humans. Canada possesses a substantial amount of this water, while other countries are less fortunate. One of these countries is the United States of America, the biggest users of water in the world. [tags: Argumentative Essays]

1035 words
(3 pages)

We Need a New Method of Purifying Drinking Water Essay - Chlorine has been purifying our drinking water for the last century. Chlorine has many uses; it is used as an amazing water disinfectant to rid water of harmful organisms, it sanitizes many surfaces, and it is used in the production of many products. Virtually all water borne diseases have been wiped out as a result of purification of drinking water - usually with chlorine. Life expectancy has increased fifty percent in the last century because people are able to drink clean, healthy water. Two hundred million people in America and Canada drink, shower and swim in chlorinated water everyday, and ninety-eight percent of drinking water treatment facilities use chlorination (Christman, 1998). [tags: Drinking Water Essays]
. 7 Works Cited

2069 words
(5.9 pages)

Recycling Processes for Wastewater Essay - 1.0 INTRODUCTION Recycling water in Canada is an important issue to understand and implement because of its wide ranging benefits in environmental matters. Canadian wastewater can be recycled by water treatments, each of these treatments results in varying water qualities, and these varying water qualities can be reused for industrial, unrestricted access or restricted access uses. Recycling wastewater is a crucial part of sustainable development; however, many communities in Canada are not active participants of this subject. [tags: Canada, water treatment, environment]
. 7 Works Cited

1440 words
(4.1 pages)

Canada and Mexico's Viewpoints of NAFTA Essay - Canada and Mexico's Viewpoints of NAFTA When the Canada/U.S. free trade agreement came into effect, the Mexican's were very impressed by the provision and opportunities that opened for both sides. Mexico then approached the U.S. seeking to form a similar agreement with them. This brought forth a new issue in Canada, should they let Mexico and the U.S. form an agreement without them. Or should they participate, thus transforming their deal with the U.S. into a trilateral agreement including Mexico. [tags: Free Trade Agreements Foreign Affairs Essays]

3802 words
(10.9 pages)

Problems Generated by Industralization and Urbanization in Ontario Province - Justification In Ontario province, Industrialization and Urbanization have generated a lot of problems. One such problem is Water Pollution, related to mining and industries, road salt, in drinking water, by vehicular emissions etc. The presence of mercury has also been noted in lakes and rivers. The Chlor-alkali plant of pulp and paper industry used mercury to produce chlorine, but now such plants are not working and the level of mercury in water bodies has been dropped since that time. [1] Mining affects the environment by water pollution as discharge of acidic drainage, metals, cyanide and suspended particles in water bodies. [tags: canda, water pollution, drinking water]
. 6 Works Cited

1067 words
(3 pages)

The Importance of the Great Lakes Essay - When discussing issues relating to bodies of water, there is always something to be considered and those are issues that deal with water, which are not as simple as it seem. To the point persons, communities, nation states, and international organizations has the implicit means to provide a thoughtful and significant plan that would provide a solution to the intended issue. The right approach in taking those necessary steps are achieving a well thought out plan is the ability to adhere collective decisions and cooperative actions. [tags: Geography, Water]
. 5 Works Cited

1577 words
(4.5 pages)

Other articles

Walkerton Tragedy - The Full Wiki

Walkerton Tragedy: Wikis

The water supply for the town of Walkerton was operated by the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission, with Stan Koebel as manager and Frank Koebel as water foreman. Neither had any formal training in their position, retaining their jobs through three decades of on-the-job experience. The water supply became contaminated with the highly dangerous O157:H7 strain of E. coli bacteria, from farm runoff into an adjacent well that was known for years to be vulnerable to contamination.

Starting May 15, 2000, many residents of the town of about 5,000 began to simultaneously experience bloody diarrhea. gastrointestinal infections and other symptoms of E. coli infection. For days the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission insisted the water supply was "OK" despite being in possession of laboratory tests that had found evidence of contamination. On May 21, an escalation in the number of patients with similar symptoms finally spurred the region's Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Murray McQuigge, to issue a boil water advisory, warning residents not to drink the water.

At least seven people died directly from drinking the E. coli contaminated water, who might have been saved if the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission had admitted to contaminated water sooner, and about 2,500 became ill.

The CBC news noted:

Premier Harris immediately blamed the former NDP government for loosening water standards. Within a week he had announced public inquiry that wound up laying part of the blame for the Walkerton disaster on cutbacks ordered by the Harris government.

During the time of the tragedy, both Stan and Frank Koebel denied any wrongdoing and firmly held that the water at Walkerton was safe to drink. However, as the tragedy grew in severity the two were eventually part of the criminal investigation into the tragedy, and, as a result, both would eventually plead guilty to a charge of common nuisance through a plea bargain. In their plea, they admitted to falsifying reports and Frank admitted to drinking on the job, though a beer fridge did exist at the facility. [ 1 ]

They were both formally sentenced on December 21, 2004. with Stan receiving a year in jail and Frank nine months of house arrest. Reaction to their sentencing was mixed.

The Ontario Clean Water Agency was put in charge of the cleanup of Walkerton's water system.

An inquiry, known as the Walkerton Commission led by Court of Appeal for Ontario Associate Chief Justice Dennis O'Connor, reported in 2002. Part 1 [ 2 ] was released in January 2002. It estimated that the Walkerton water tragedy cost a minimum of $64.5-155 million CAD and laid much of the blame at the door of the Walkerten Public Utillities Commission.

From the report:

For years, the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission operators engaged in a host of improper operating practices, including failing to use adequate doses of chlorine. failing to monitor chlorine residuals daily, making false entries about residuals in daily operating records, and misstating the locations at which microbiological samples were taken. The operators knew that these practices were unacceptable and contrary to Ministry of Environment guidelines and directives.

The Ontario government was also blamed for not regulating water quality and not enforcing the guidelines that had been in place.

Part 2 [ 3 ] of the report made many recommendations for improving the quality of water and public health in Ontario. All of its recommendations have been accepted by succeeding governments of the province. The recommendations have also influenced provincial policies across Canada.

Key recommendations touched on source water protection. the training and certification of operators, a quality management system for water suppliers, and more competent enforcement. In Ontario, these requirements have been incorporated into new legislation.

For an in-depth account of the tragedy, see Well of Lies: The Walkerton Water Tragedy (McClelland & Stewart 2002) by Colin N. Perkel.

The many lessons learned from this incident were described by Kim Vicente in his book The Human Factor .

A 2005 CBC Television docu-drama called Betrayed was based loosely upon the Walkerton tragedy.

In 2001 a similar outbreak in North Battleford, Saskatchewan caused by the protozoan Cryptosporidium affected at least 5,800 people.

Critical Approach

In 2008, University of Toronto academic Scott Prudham published an account of the tragedy that claimed that the neoliberal policies of premier Mike Harris significantly reduced the capacity of local environmental regulators. Prudham claims the Harris government "created what proved to be a lethal combination of privatization accompanied by laissez-faire re-regulation". A series of neoliberal reforms removed key pieces of environmental regulation and severely cut budgets for regulators. Prudham argues that the tragedy could have been avoided had regulatory powers not been curbed in this way. Prudham concludes by arguing that "if any good can come from the tragedy it is. to serve as a reminder that social regulation of nature is meant to protect us from the self-regulating market, and not the other way around". [ 4 ]

References
  1. ^ CBC News: Inside Walkerton Reference for the preceding three paragraphs: CBC News in Depth: Inside Walkerton
  2. ^ [1] The Walkerton Report, Part One, described events in the community and a series of failures, both human and systemic, that led to contamination of the water supply. The report made recommendations based on the circumstances of the tragedy.
  3. ^ [2] The Walkerton Report, Part Two, discussed water safety across the province and the steps needed to prevent similar tragedies. It made ninety-three recommendations.
  4. ^ . Prudham (2003) Poisoning the well: neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario. Geoforum 35 (2004) 343–359
External links

Walkerton: Key truths submerged in journalist’s account of contaminated water tragedy - World Socialist Web Site

World Socialist Web Site Walkerton: Key truths submerged in journalist’s account of contaminated water tragedy By Carl Bronski
14 August 2003

Well Of Lies: The Walkerton Water Tragedy by Colin N. Perkel, McLelland & Stewart Ltd, 2002.

Stan and Frank Koebel, the brothers who held the top jobs at the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission in May 2000 when the town’s water supply became contaminated with a deadly strain of e-coli bacterium, recently made a brief court appearance to answer a number of criminal charges, including public endangerment, breach of trust and making and using false documents. The brothers are the only individuals facing prosecution for their role in the Walkerton water contamination tragedy. If convicted, the Koebels face from two to ten years of imprisonment. Their cases were put over until September.

It was not the first time the two men attended legal proceedings for their role in the tragedy that left seven people dead and over 2,000 sickened. In December 2000, both gave testimony at a judicial inquiry after intense public pressure had forced Ontario’s Tory provincial government to reverse course and call for an official investigation. Although the brothers, acting as waterworks manager and foreman, admitted to falsifying chlorination level reports as a matter of course over many years, that inquiry attributed much of the responsibility for the water contamination tragedy to the actions of the Conservative government under then premier Mike Harris. Among the inquiry’s findings was that Harris and other top Tory cabinet ministers had ignored specific warnings that they were placing lives at risk by gutting clean water regulations and Environment Ministry capabilities.

Already, national television stations and newspapers will be making motel bookings in the Walkerton area for the September proceedings against the Koebels. Rolodexes will be reactivated. Media researchers will be dispatched to once again mine background data on the rural, central Ontario region. Ambitious reporters will ambush the Koebel brothers as they leave their homes or sit in a restaurant. And producers and editors will no doubt recommend to staff and viewers that they pick up a copy of newspaperman Colin Perkel’s book, Well of Lies for an “authoritative” account of the tragedy. Those who follow this recommendation would be well advised to peruse Perkel’s story with a critical eye.

Perkel is the senior political correspondent at the Ontario legislature for the Canadian Press. He has written extensively on the Walkerton events from the period immediately after the e-coli outbreak was discovered through the judicial inquiry up to and including the current Koebel arraignments. In Well of Lies. he has combined interviews with area residents as well as some local and provincial officials with a much less exhaustive account of the testimony at the judicial inquiry to produce an undemanding, pot-boiler style chronicle of the events surrounding the water contamination tragedy.

Perkel is interested in providing a “human” account of the Walkerton incident. We are provided with details on the awful suffering of the victims of the epidemic and their families. We read about the down-home relationships of the townsfolk and their various reactions to the crisis and its aftermath. We are provided, in well over a third of the book, with a blow-by-blow account of the weaknesses and failures of the Koebel brothers and their small town overseers in the local government. There is even a lengthy description of the rainstorm that forced manure contaminants into the water system—“Lightening split the night sky as if angry gods were venting their fury on a hapless world. ” But what we do not learn is the true extent of the criminal culpability of Mike Harris and senior members of his cabinet.

Whereas the single largest section of the report produced by the Walkerton inquiry explicitly rejected Tory government attempts to make Stan and Frank Koebel the fall guys in the whole affair, and instead dealt with the reckless manner in which the Tories had dismantled the province’s water management system, Perkel’s book strangely avoids any sustained analysis of government culpability. The five-hour testimony of Mike Harris, the first premier ever to be called as a witness before a judicial inquiry, merits barely two pages and is largely filled with Harris’s rote denials of any responsibility. Even a quaint description of the area’s Saugeen River receives more attention from the author.

To be sure, given the enormous coverage and sensational testimony at the inquiry it would be difficult to conceal some essential truths. Perkel does make it clear to his readers that the wholesale cuts by the Harris government to the Environment Ministry and the privatization of water testing contributed to the incident. He shows that the Owen Sound Regional Office of the Environment Ministry was aware since 1998 of the presence of e-coli in water samples from the Walkerton system and that the town had recorded contaminated samples several years prior to that. He characterizes Harris and some of his subordinates as smug ideologues.

Perkel is much more charitable to the previous New Democratic Party government of Bob Rae, which held office from 1990 to 1995. The Rae government helped prepare the terrain for the Tories’ wholesale dismantling of the province’s water testing system, by allowing municipalities to use private testing labs and spinning off the Clean Water Agency from the Environment Ministry. The author, however, can only devote one line in his book to Rae’s dangerous precedent before passing it off as a small matter explained away by the NDP’s reaction to negative economic conditions.

However, while the drinking problems of Frank Koebel or the imperious management style of his brother Stan merit repeated documentation, the wholesale destruction of entire swaths of provincial infrastructure by a Tory government mobilized by a rabid, anti-social ideology and enthusiastically supported by the most powerful sections of Canadian big business gets only a paragraph here or there in the 237-page book. Perkel does not want to make too many waves. It is certainly clear that Harris did not make a very good impression on him during the premier’s two appearances in Walkerton. But that often is the trouble. Perkel seldom ventures beyond the realm of impression whenever called upon for serious analysis.

Perkel’s account conforms with the observation on the jacket cover of Well of Lies. “The failures that led to the tragedy were ordinary failures.” The manager of the waterworks was ill-trained and poorly educated. The foreman did not even believe in the desirability of chlorination. The public utilities commissioners were small town folk who trusted the “local boys.” Bureaucracies can be convoluted places to work. The Ontario government made cuts to balance the budget. There was a heck of a rainstorm one night. In giving relatively equal weight to any number of circumstances and occurrences, Perkel, whether he intends to or not, obscures the role of the Tory government, which in the later half of the 1990s spearheaded Canadian capital’s assault on the working class.

Even the title of the book leads one down the garden path. Who are the liars? After all, Stan and Frank Koebel provide the main “through line” for the book, not the Harris government. But these two men, however belatedly, admitted their responsibility, conceding that they regularly provided false information to various officials and engaged in shoddy work practices. The same cannot be said for Harris and his colleagues.

Collateral damage of the Tories’ Common Sense Revolution

In his inquiry testimony, Harris repeatedly drew attention to his government’s record of cuts to public and social services and steep tax reductions for the well-off. He boasted that the Tories had brought a “different,” private sector “philosophy” to government and claimed the Tories’ public spending and tax cuts had “led to jobs and tremendous growth in government revenues.” While he dared not say so explicitly, the message of Harris’s testimony was that the seven fatalities in Walkerton were a reasonable price to pay for the increase in corporate profits and the incomes of the province’s better-off citizens. In effect, the town’s tragedy was just so much collateral damage in the “Common Sense Revolution.”

At the inquiry Harris defended his decision to halve the size of the Environment Ministry and privatize water testing. “At no time was it ever brought to Cabinet’s attention, to my attention, that the implementation of these. plans would cause increased risk to health and safety of any citizen anywhere in the province.” Inquiry counsel had little difficulty in proving this was a lie. He cited a “Confidential Advice to Cabinet” memo that stated, “The risk to human health and environment may increase.” Then counsel referred to an Environment and Energy Ministry Business Plan presented to the Tory caucus. It warned of “increased risk to human health and the environment as a result of decreased compliance and enforcement” and of a “reduced level of front-line service, slower response times to complaints and reduced technical assistance.”

Harris then switched course. Ignoring the testimony he gave only minutes before, he now acknowledged that the Tories had known of the downsizing risks but thought the risks could be “managed.” Where, asked counsel, were the documents outlining how the government planned to “manage” that risk? In replying, Harris contradicted himself yet again. “No. I can’t point to that. By the same token, I can’t recall at any time being told by the ministry or senior officials that there would be an increase in risk.” After inquiry counsel showed that the government tried to “manage” the adverse political fallout from its cuts by omitting all references to increased risk in the public version of the Ministry of the Environment Business Plan, Harris declared, “there’s risk in everything, there’s risk in walking across the street.”

There was other damning testimony at the inquiry that did not make it into Perkel’s book. Dr. Richard Schabas, Ontario’s chief medical officer in 1997, gave evidence that the government ignored direct appeals for stricter public health guidelines on numerous occasions. “This was a government that I think really held public institutions in contempt,” he said. Schabas described how he had been excluded from a 1997 Cabinet meeting where he had been delegated by the Health Ministry to oppose plans to offload all funding for Public Health Boards onto municipalities, which often did not have the means to absorb the costs. On arriving at the meeting, Schabas was asked by one of Harris’s aides to leave. “The premier doesn’t want you here for this discussion,” the aide told him. Schabas then testified that he turned to the premier to see if he was indeed being ordered to leave. “The premier looked at me. and then turned away. As far as I was concerned, the premier was turning his back on public health.” The doctor was so outraged by the government’s attitude to public services that he resigned in 1998.

Brenda Elliott, who was Environment minister when the massive cuts in the Environment Ministry were being implemented in 1996, claimed she was for the most part unaware of at least 10 departmental documents warning that the cuts posed real dangers. One of these was directed to senior cabinet officials, including premier Harris. It stated that “risk to human health and the environment may increase as a result of improper or illegal actions which are neither detected, nor controlled.” When asked to explain why the government had chosen to privatize her ministry’s water testing responsibilities over a two-month period rather than the two to three years recommended by her own officials, the minister in charge of the most radical reform of the clean water safety net in the province’s history simply stated, “I can’t recall specifically why that would have occurred.”

There were other revelations surrounding the inquiry. Former environment minister Norm Sterling testified that he had never read the warning letter sent to him by his cabinet colleague, Health Minister Wilson, that he had not read Ontario’s new drinking water guidelines and that he was not even aware that the new guidelines were voluntary and not enforceable by law. Sterling has since been promoted to a more senior cabinet portfolio. And it was learned that in 1997 senior Environment officials spent much of a two-day meeting discussing “how to protect themselves from legal liability in case of environmental catastrophe as a result of increased work load or staff reductions.”

There was other evidence to suggest that the government was less than forthcoming in providing documents to the inquiry. The inquiry repeatedly charged the government with hampering its investigation and on at least three occasions police investigators were dispatched to search Harris’s offices. Ultimately, the inquiry reported that at least 500 files that might have proved relevant to its investigation had been deleted from government computers.

It is interesting to note that in his most recent dispatch from Walkerton on the occasion of the June 10 court appearance by the Koebel brothers, Perkel notes concern among many town residents over the failure to lay charges against other municipal officials. He fails to mention, however, that many in Walkerton voiced anger that no charges were laid against senior members of the Conservative government, including the now retired Harris.

The Walkerton tragedy represented a devastating indictment of the Tory program to divest government of social responsibility and hand it over to profit interests. It is also undeniable that responsibility for the debacle lies squarely at the highest levels of the Ontario government. Colin Perkel’s book downplays this central fact in a web of impressionistic detail that may produce exciting narrative, but fails to see the forest for all of the trees.